—
63 —
Pentecostals and Charismatics make up the main body of
churches who embrace speaking in tongues as a part of their official
doctrine. They represent about 10% of all American congregations.
Speaking in tongues has long been considered a
controversial issue among many churches. Often blamed for creating division,
or attributed to heresy or fanaticism, the practice has been banned entirely
by many churches. This seems somewhat ironic since the primary author of the
New Testament, the Apostle Paul, possessed an abundant gift of tongues (1
Cor. 14:18), encouraged all believers to have the same experience (1 Cor.
14:5), and warned the church to not forbid persons from speaking with
tongues (1 Cor. 14:39).
Some have sought to discredit the modern day validity
of speaking in tongues, claiming that it vanished with the other Charismatic
gifts at the close of the apostolic era. However, any good student of church
history realizes this theory is baseless, as numerous references to tongues
and other gifts are consistently seen in the writings of church leaders for
twenty centuries. The History of the Christian Church, by Philip Schaff
records that speaking in tongues occurred among the Camisards, the Cevennes
in France, among the early Quakers and Methodists in the Irish revival of
1859, and among the Irvingites in 1831. The Encyclopedia Britannica states
that glossolalia (speaking in tongues) has recurred in Christian revivals of
every age — among the mendicant friars of the thirteenth century, among the
Jasenists and early Quakers, the persecuted Protestants of the Cevennes, and
the Irvingites.
The idea of speaking in tongues originates in the New
Testament book of Acts. At the height of the Jewish festival, Pentecost, the
post ascension disciples of Jesus were filled with the Holy Spirit and
manifested this unique phenomena of speaking in other languages
(glossolalia).
Acts 2:1 "Now when the Day of Pentecost had fully
come, they were all with one accord in one place.
Prior to His departure to Heaven, Jesus had instructed
his followers to wait in Jerusalem until they received this promised
blessing (Acts 1:4). The baptism with the Holy Spirit, as He described it
(Acts 1:5), would give them special power (Greek, DUNAMIS, miraculous,
dynamic power), enabling them to proclaim the Gospel everywhere. "But you
shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be
witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end
of the earth" (Acts 1:8).
The day of Pentecost marked the beginning of the Holy
Spirit's outpouring upon the church, but it was not the conclusion. Other
followers also experienced this infilling of the Holy Spirit, accompanied by
the same manifestation of speaking in other tongues. In fact, it appears
that speaking in tongues became viewed as the initial, physical evidence
which proved the infilling of the Holy Spirit. This was first seen by the
events which occurred at the house of Cornelius, a gentile, to whom God sent
Peter to minister. Until this time, most believers (who were mainly Jewish)
thought the baptism with the Holy Spirit was exclusive to the Jews. However,
Peter was amazed to see Holy Spirit given to Cornelius and his family. How
was he able to recognize this? He cited, "For they heard them speak with
tongues and magnify God..." (Acts 10:46).
This pattern was repeated again when Paul ministered
at Ephesus. Once more tongues accompanied the gift of the Holy Spirit. "And
when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they
spoke with tongues and prophesied" (Acts 19:6). However, when Peter and John
ministered at Samaria, the Holy Spirit was given again, but this time
nothing is mentioned about tongues. "Then they laid hands on them, and they
received the Holy Spirit" (Acts 8:17). Verses 18 and 19 say that an
observer, Simon the Sorcerer, "saw" the reception of the Spirit by the
Samaritans, and whatever he witnessed motivated him to offer money to
purchase the same ability to bestow the Spirit. It's speculated that he
probably saw them speaking in tongues.
The fifth century church father, Augustine of Hippo,
was very insightful about the beliefs held by the early church regarding
speaking in tongues and supported this view. From his comments about Acts
8:17-19, it was his assumption, due to his own experience in such matters,
that Simon must have seen the Samaritans speaking in tongues. Augustine
wrote, "We still do what the apostles did when they laid hands on the
Samaritans and called down the Holy Spirit on them by laying on of hands. It
is expected that new converts should speak with new tongues."¹
Most Pentecostals and Charismatics generally agree
that the baptism with the Holy Spirit is evidenced by speaking in tongues,
and is separate and distinct from the birth of the Spirit (John 3:7), which
occurs when faith is placed in Christ for salvation.
Furthermore, they believe that speaking in tongues is
involved in three distinct functions: (1) As the initial, physical evidence
of the baptism with the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:46), (2) as a spiritual prayer
language which is used for personal edification (1 Cor. 14:4, Rom. 8:26-27),
and (3) as a special utterance gift to the church, which when interpreted,
serves to edify the body (1 Cor. 12:10, 14:6). Paul indicated that not all
persons would have the latter "gift of tongues" used to edify the church (1
Cor. 12:30), but desired for all believers to be able to speak in tongues
for personal edification. "I wish you all spoke with tongues..." (1 Cor.
14:5).
¹ Augustine, Vol. 4 |